What Makes a Model?

There is an argument that within the post-modern, virtual world that we can be anything, or indeed, anyone we want to be.

Traditionally, female editorial/fashion models should be 5’9 to 6ft tall, with a 33-inch bust 23-inch waist and 33-inch hips. This is not the only criterion, agencies tend to recruit on a more rounded basis and the modelling industry has much broader horizons.

Similarly, while there is still a baseline, entry level price point, camera equipment has become increasingly affordable. A base line SLR and kit lens bundle can be had for £399-new, cheaper second hand.

On the one hand, this is extremely empowering and allows people to participate and develop their photography. For whatever purpose. On the other, it invites a certain element. One who seeks to use a camera as a means of gaining access to (usually young women) with darker motivations.

True, though thankfully rare, I’ve met some very technically able photographers, whose moral compass is somewhere in the foundries of hell. However, the Guy with Camera (GWC) is more easily spotted. Typically, they can be sussed out in their approach and communication/lack thereof.

They may carry a “professional looking” camera but have no port-folio/website, or one cultivated from stolen images-the right click n’ save manoeuvre. Chances are, at some point, in a model’s career, regardless whether internationally published, aspiring, or hobbyist, they will encounter one.

Before we go any further, the GWC must never be confused with an enthusiast amateur, or hobbyist photographer. These tend to enthuse about their equipment, images and enjoy working with models from a creative perspective.

Now, I have different cameras for different contexts. SLRs being the most obvious choices for location work. I run Sony’s older Alpha (Minolta) since its what I’m most familiar with, and lenses are in plentiful, inexpensive supply.

I also use mirrorless Compact System Cameras (CSC) with APSC sensors, for street photography and similar situations where the larger camera would attract unfavourable attention. Given most models are expecting SLR, I tend to introduce the smaller camera much later. Most are very impressed with the results, too.    

  

I am always shocked but not ultimately, not surprised by the stories models tell me, of inappropriate “photographer” behaviour through the course of our shoots. Common incidents include pushing levels e.g. trying to cajole a model into doing nude/topless work when lingerie is their stop-point. Sadly there are also those who touch, grope, or otherwise intimidate.

Pre-Shoot Communications

A while back, I was discussing this topic with a Vegas based model (who also has a fantastic Urbex You tube channel)  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVKmu1SCKzo  Red flags for her, include a photographer who cannot construct an articulate and detailed paragraph regarding their approach, the nature and duration of the shoot.  

I also work along very similar lines, since a photographer is potentially vulnerable. References are a good indicator, but I am also guided by discussion and gut. 

Two of my first questions are (a) what attracted them to me in particular (b) What direction they were looking to take their modelling/port-folio. My sole objective is to create the standard and type of images, the client is looking for. However, it also gives much wider insight, into their motivations, character and ultimately, ensures both parties know exactly what to expect.  

This keeps things fluid and comfortable, on the day. If our creative approaches are wildly different, or otherwise incompatible, I will politely decline. I’ve done so, on several occasions and this policy has served me well.

Sure, we all start somewhere, but a series of selfies, gives little indication of potential, or aptitude. If you are starting out, as a model and with serious intent, decide upon your genre(s)/levels. Then find a photographer, one you feel comfortable with, and invest in a paid shoot.

Case Study: Carla

Now, before I became preoccupied with a more cautionary, some would say, darker note. I was talking about models coming from all walks of life. Carla stands 4ft 10 and is agency signed, with two years’ experience.

She approached me wanting to expand her port-folio. Contradiction in terms perhaps but she openly describes herself as shy. Hence, I was particularly keen to establish a good and extended rapport beforehand. With a relaxed but conscientious approach, the two hours flowed nicely, and we were pleased with the results. She’s someone I would happily work/collaborate with in future.