There is an argument that
within the post-modern, virtual world that we can be anything, or indeed,
anyone we want to be.
Traditionally, female
editorial/fashion models should be 5’9 to 6ft tall, with a 33-inch bust 23-inch
waist and 33-inch hips. This is not the only criterion, agencies tend to
recruit on a more rounded basis and the modelling industry has much broader
horizons.
Similarly, while there is
still a baseline, entry level price point, camera equipment has become increasingly
affordable. A base line SLR and kit lens bundle can be had for £399-new,
cheaper second hand.
On the one hand, this is
extremely empowering and allows people to participate and develop their
photography. For whatever purpose. On the other, it invites a certain element.
One who seeks to use a camera as a means of gaining access to (usually young
women) with darker motivations.
True, though thankfully rare,
I’ve met some very technically able photographers, whose moral compass is
somewhere in the foundries of hell. However, the Guy with Camera (GWC) is more
easily spotted. Typically, they can be sussed out in their approach and
communication/lack thereof.
They may carry a “professional
looking” camera but have no port-folio/website, or one cultivated from stolen
images-the right click n’ save manoeuvre. Chances are, at some point, in a
model’s career, regardless whether internationally published, aspiring, or
hobbyist, they will encounter one.
Before we go any further, the
GWC must never be confused with an enthusiast amateur, or hobbyist
photographer. These tend to enthuse about their equipment, images and enjoy
working with models from a creative perspective.
Now, I have different cameras
for different contexts. SLRs being the most obvious choices for location work.
I run Sony’s older Alpha (Minolta) since its what I’m most familiar with, and lenses
are in plentiful, inexpensive supply.
I also use mirrorless Compact
System Cameras (CSC) with APSC sensors, for street photography and similar
situations where the larger camera would attract unfavourable attention. Given
most models are expecting SLR, I tend to introduce the smaller camera much later.
Most are very impressed with the results, too.
I am always shocked but not
ultimately, not surprised by the stories models tell me, of inappropriate “photographer”
behaviour through the course of our shoots. Common incidents include pushing
levels e.g. trying to cajole a model into doing nude/topless work when lingerie
is their stop-point. Sadly there are also those who touch, grope, or otherwise
intimidate.
Pre-Shoot Communications
A while back, I was discussing
this topic with a Vegas based model (who also has a fantastic Urbex You tube
channel) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVKmu1SCKzo
Red flags for her, include a
photographer who cannot construct an articulate and detailed paragraph
regarding their approach, the nature and duration of the shoot.
I also work along very similar
lines, since a photographer is potentially vulnerable. References are a good
indicator, but I am also guided by discussion and gut.
Two of my first questions are
(a) what attracted them to me in particular (b) What direction they were
looking to take their modelling/port-folio. My sole objective is to create the
standard and type of images, the client is looking for. However, it also gives
much wider insight, into their motivations, character and ultimately, ensures
both parties know exactly what to expect.
This keeps things fluid and
comfortable, on the day. If our creative approaches are wildly different, or otherwise
incompatible, I will politely decline. I’ve done so, on several occasions and this
policy has served me well.
Sure, we all start somewhere,
but a series of selfies, gives little indication of potential, or aptitude. If
you are starting out, as a model and with serious intent, decide upon your
genre(s)/levels. Then find a photographer, one you feel comfortable with, and invest
in a paid shoot.
Case Study: Carla
Now, before I became
preoccupied with a more cautionary, some would say, darker note. I was talking
about models coming from all walks of life. Carla stands 4ft 10 and is agency
signed, with two years’ experience.
She approached me wanting to
expand her port-folio. Contradiction in terms perhaps but she openly describes
herself as shy. Hence, I was particularly keen to establish a good and extended
rapport beforehand. With a relaxed but conscientious approach, the two hours
flowed nicely, and we were pleased with the results. She’s someone I would
happily work/collaborate with in future.