Showing posts with label Portfolios. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Portfolios. Show all posts

Friday, August 6, 2021

Catching up With Krystal: Boho Dresses & Borrowed Bicycles








 It had been a good while since Krystal, and I worked together. She had retired from modeling, wanting to concentrate on mentoring new models and the fashion/clothing side of the business.   

Out of the blue she emailed, saying she wanted to shoot with some dresses and a traditional “roadster” bicycle complete with panniers, dynamo and basket.  Given COVID is still very prevalent, I am being very careful about who and where I will work. Presently, studios are off but I’m agreeable to open, sparsely populated locations, theme allowing. 


We met at the location and enjoyed a very relaxed shoot, much of our conversation revolving around the business, and comparing notes regarding new models we had worked with. The good, the bad, and the downright bizarre. One common narrative was their desire (and expectation) for instant recognition.  


Some aspiring models have expected to be snapped up and agency represented within a week. Constructive tempering of expectations is met with defensive disgust and quite often, tirades on social media. However, we also discussed some very good debutants who were personable, willing to learn and looking toward building a solid career. I was also touched to learn she recommends me to new models she feels show promise.   


Long story short, it was lovely to work and catch up with Krystal again and I'm pleased she was happy with the results.  

Friday, June 25, 2021

Body Art : Amy &MuA


 




I’d been approached by a makeup artist/body painter, via a portfolio hosting/networking site. His standard of work is very high, and I was flattered to learn he’d been keen to work with me for a while. Networking sites are a useful means of connecting with models, photographers and related professionals. Referencing and other important records are there, making shoots much smoother and safer.    


With this in mind, I gently swerved recommending specific models, since the very nature of bodypainting/makeup is a very intimate process. Any recipient needs to be completely comfortable with the artist, beforehand.  


As luck would have it, he had been talking with Amy Jade, prior to lockdown, so with restrictions being progressively relaxed, they mutually agreed to Thursday evening. This suited me, since extended hours of daylight were conducive to location shooting-public decency permitting.  


Some last-minute correspondence confirmed this was a comfortable proposition for all parties. The shoot itself was relatively short, about an hour, which was also the artist’s timescale for undertaking the design. Amy has tattoos, although these aren’t extensive, which also shortens preparation time, since additional coverage isn’t required.  


Ultimately model and MUA are happy with my work, and I enjoyed the experience.   

Sunday, September 2, 2018

What Makes a Model?










There is an argument that within the post-modern, virtual world that we can be anything, or indeed, anyone we want to be.

Traditionally, female editorial/fashion models should be 5’9 to 6ft tall, with a 33-inch bust 23-inch waist and 33-inch hips. This is not the only criterion, agencies tend to recruit on a more rounded basis and the modelling industry has much broader horizons.

Similarly, while there is still a baseline, entry level price point, camera equipment has become increasingly affordable. A base line SLR and kit lens bundle can be had for £399-new, cheaper second hand.

On the one hand, this is extremely empowering and allows people to participate and develop their photography. For whatever purpose. On the other, it invites a certain element. One who seeks to use a camera as a means of gaining access to (usually young women) with darker motivations.

True, though thankfully rare, I’ve met some very technically able photographers, whose moral compass is somewhere in the foundries of hell. However, the Guy with Camera (GWC) is more easily spotted. Typically, they can be sussed out in their approach and communication/lack thereof.

They may carry a “professional looking” camera but have no port-folio/website, or one cultivated from stolen images-the right click n’ save manoeuvre. Chances are, at some point, in a model’s career, regardless whether internationally published, aspiring, or hobbyist, they will encounter one.

Before we go any further, the GWC must never be confused with an enthusiast amateur, or hobbyist photographer. These tend to enthuse about their equipment, images and enjoy working with models from a creative perspective.

Now, I have different cameras for different contexts. SLRs being the most obvious choices for location work. I run Sony’s older Alpha (Minolta) since its what I’m most familiar with, and lenses are in plentiful, inexpensive supply.

I also use mirrorless Compact System Cameras (CSC) with APSC sensors, for street photography and similar situations where the larger camera would attract unfavourable attention. Given most models are expecting SLR, I tend to introduce the smaller camera much later. Most are very impressed with the results, too.    
  
I am always shocked but not ultimately, not surprised by the stories models tell me, of inappropriate “photographer” behaviour through the course of our shoots. Common incidents include pushing levels e.g. trying to cajole a model into doing nude/topless work when lingerie is their stop-point. Sadly there are also those who touch, grope, or otherwise intimidate.


Pre-Shoot Communications

A while back, I was discussing this topic with a Vegas based model (who also has a fantastic Urbex You tube channel)  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVKmu1SCKzo  Red flags for her, include a photographer who cannot construct an articulate and detailed paragraph regarding their approach, the nature and duration of the shoot.  

I also work along very similar lines, since a photographer is potentially vulnerable. References are a good indicator, but I am also guided by discussion and gut. 

Two of my first questions are (a) what attracted them to me in particular (b) What direction they were looking to take their modelling/port-folio. My sole objective is to create the standard and type of images, the client is looking for. However, it also gives much wider insight, into their motivations, character and ultimately, ensures both parties know exactly what to expect.  

This keeps things fluid and comfortable, on the day. If our creative approaches are wildly different, or otherwise incompatible, I will politely decline. I’ve done so, on several occasions and this policy has served me well.

Sure, we all start somewhere, but a series of selfies, gives little indication of potential, or aptitude. If you are starting out, as a model and with serious intent, decide upon your genre(s)/levels. Then find a photographer, one you feel comfortable with, and invest in a paid shoot.

Case Study: Carla

Now, before I became preoccupied with a more cautionary, some would say, darker note. I was talking about models coming from all walks of life. Carla stands 4ft 10 and is agency signed, with two years’ experience.

She approached me wanting to expand her port-folio. Contradiction in terms perhaps but she openly describes herself as shy. Hence, I was particularly keen to establish a good and extended rapport beforehand. With a relaxed but conscientious approach, the two hours flowed nicely, and we were pleased with the results. She’s someone I would happily work/collaborate with in future.
       

Playing with Light: In the Studio with Kym

  I do a lot of location work and lean toward natural light, but Kym invited me to come and shoot her in a studio context. We decided on a f...