Showing posts with label PVC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PVC. Show all posts

Thursday, May 9, 2019

S Is For Shibari








Shibari, translated literally, means “To tie” but, in western popular culture, a word synonymous with bondage/BDSM and similar fetishism.
There are connotations, which I am slightly uncomfortable with.
Specifically, undertones of sexualised violence, towards women. That said; life is about questioning and exploring. With this and other “non touch” protocols in mind, the tying was performed by a highly qualified third party.
The shoot started with a fetish theme-our old friend PVC; and became progressively more provocative. Rules are made to be broken, but model comfort and safety (not forgetting my own) must remain intact.
Thankfully, Lauren seemed at ease throughout and I think this shows in the images. Not something I would entertain with an inexperienced model, or without a wealth of clearly established safeguards.
Given the temperamental compatibility between Sony A (Minolta) mount cameras and studio remote triggers, I took the A58 workhorse and 50mm 1.8 prime as a standby. These were shot using my A6000 and 60mm 2.8. prime. F14, 1/125 and ISO 100, in case you were curious...

Friday, March 22, 2019

Michelle







I was tempted to call this entry “The Tale of The Irish Italian Glamour Model, The Shetland Pony, the Potcheen and The Welsh Nationalists". However, I’d be accused of sensationalism, and I dare say, much worse…
Michelle is a former Page3 model, of Irish and Italian heritage. She also has a Shetland Pony and a general love of equines. I’ve given up shooting novice models, specifically those under 30, due to reliability and their insistence upon doing TF shoots.
I was approached by a male model “admiring” my work. Having confirmed I will happily work with both genders, he felt I should… Drive to London, book and pay for a studio, shoot him and provide him with images. All at cost to me. Polite email reply, thanking him for his interest and my quote.  
Michelle shares my contempt for this generally, no-win, one-sided futility. She blocks any photographer/studio/publication inviting her to do anything TFP. Little surprise to discover we got along, pre shoot and gelled well, during.
Glamour is a genre that can mean many things. However, it most frequently conjures up visions of topless women, tabloid newspapers and “Lads Mags”. Not really my remit, unless of course we’re taking an ironic, tongue-in-cheek stance.  We decided upon a mix of implied, topless, lingerie, with some fine art thrown in for good measure.
In contrast to “Glamour” I’m quite fond of fine-art and implied, because of their subtle, suggestive tones. At one point, I was shooting these regularly. On the plus side, a sign models felt comfortable with me. However, not a genre I wanted to be typecast by. I am also very selective about who I will shoot nudes with.
Yes, it might be legal to shoot nudes with an 18-year old aspiring/model, but I’ve always declined. There are a lot of things, which are legal but could lead to regret. I recall an 18-year old model, who took the nude route (with another photographer), then regretted her decision immediately afterward.
She was trying to reclaim the images, and even claim she was legally a child. No. There were lots of things I (and friends) did at this age, which were perfectly legal, but not the best moves.
If a model understands the potential consequences, and has been modelling a few years, I might shoot topless/tasteful nudes with them-at 21. However, I’m more comfortable when they’re closer to 24/25.
I always ask a model to bring along a selection of lingerie and other clothing, to make the shoot more interesting. I shot Michelle at a lovely cottage location. I used a mixture of natural daylight and portable LED lighting.  
One half of the property was blessed with masses of natural light, yet still providing ample seclusion. The other featured period beams and was much darker. Hence, I went for an intimate “warm glow”. In some respects, and on paper, an f/1.4 lens would’ve been better here. However, my 50mm f/1.8 and portable “Light sabre” delivered the desired results. 
We shot for two hours, with time for clothing changes and comfort stops. I was also aware of Michelle’s underlying condition, which can leave her feeling uncomfortably tired. Not one obvious during our session, but three hours straight, is pretty much her limit. Mine too, frankly. I have undertaken longer commissions but there’s been a 45minute food and rest break between. Suffice to say, I’d happily work with Michelle on future commissions.
             

Monday, July 30, 2018

Delight in Decay Some Shoots with Krystal J










Models and derelict buildings are a contrast I have always enjoyed. I moved to London’s East End in 1992. A time, when the landscape was littered with derelict factories, warehouses and indeed, domestic dwellings. Long gone now.

I discovered a mutual love of the derelict (and indeed, the area’s more characterful pubs) during some earlier studio and location shoots, with Krystal.  While out, on other missions I noted several locations in the Harwich area. We agreed they’d be particularly good settings for a PVC/latex themed shoot.

Being well versed in the legalities and related considerations, both parties knew we needed to work quickly. All three locations were quite exposed, which has some very definite pros and cons. 

First and foremost, it's pretty obvious what you are doing.  Suggestions of theft, vandalism, breaking and entering/similar wrongdoing can be ruled out.

The derelict petrol station forecourt being a prime example. Several police patrol cars and a steady stream of rubbernecking office workers passed us. Most slowed, out of curiosity-including the Police. However, no-one stopped, or interfered.

Conversely, some seclusion is required, for discreet changing/model modesty. Rapport between model and photographer also must be “on point”; So, the desired images can flow seamlessly. Depending upon the location, there are other, environmental factors to bear in mind.

Abandoned properties can have their share of danger. Nails, needles, asbestos and unofficial residents, metal thieves- being but a few. Oh, and if you are asked to leave, smile a lot and comply. The law of trespass is difficult to enforce. Criminal damage tends to be the default avenue.

Krystal brought three dresses and we spent around 30 minutes, at each of these locations.       

While out on a ride, I noted a farm house had been recently boarded up, with no sign of activity, during subsequent fly-pasts. Krystal was keen to model a vintage tea dress, so this seemed a surreal, although thought provoking backdrop.

Arriving on the day, there were signs that the property and grounds are still very much in use. A row of older cars and agricultural equipment lay equally dormant. No sign of other life, or mercifully, any bull.  

We only wanted to use the immediate frontage and exterior farm buildings. Not least, since the sun was very intense. I slipped the f stop to 1.8 and the shutter speed to around the 4000/5000 mark. 

I seldom stray away from full manual control.However, in those contexts where you need to move quickly, or lighting is very changeable. There is an argument, for selecting aperture priority and letting the camera decide the others.  

We moved to another location, for a quick retro phone box shoot. Then Krystal spotted a retro garage forecourt. I approached the garage owners, who were only too delighted to indulge us.  The copyright for these images, belongs to Stenning Photographic (Michael Stenning). However, prints may be purchased from my site. https://michael-stenning.format.com/#1


Playing with Light: In the Studio with Kym

  I do a lot of location work and lean toward natural light, but Kym invited me to come and shoot her in a studio context. We decided on a f...